By Linda Hutcheon
1 Theorizing the postmodern: towards a poetics
2 Modelling the postmodern: parody and politics
3 proscribing the postmodern: the paradoxical aftermath of modernism
4 Decentering the postmodern: the ex-centric
5 Contextualizing the postmodern: enunciation and the revenge of “parole”
6 Historicizing the postmodern: the problematizing of history
7 Historiographic metafiction: “the hobby of previous time”
8 Intertextuality, parody, and the discourses of history
9 the matter of reference
10 topic in/of/to historical past and his story
11 Discourse, energy, ideology: humanism and postmodernism
12 Political double-talk
13 end: a poetics or a problematics?
Read Online or Download A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction PDF
Best postmodernism books
A significant new interpretation of the strategies of modernism and modernity.
The strategies of modernity and modernism are among the main arguable and vigorously debated in modern philosophy and cultural concept. during this new intervention, Fredric Jameson—perhaps the main influential and persuasive theorist of postmodernity—excavates and explores those notions in a clean and illuminating demeanour.
The remarkable revival of discussions of modernity, in addition to of latest theories of inventive modernism, calls for awareness in its personal correct. it sort of feels transparent that the (provisional) disappearance of choices to capitalism performs its half within the common try and revive 'modernity' as a social excellent. but the paradoxes of the idea that illustrate its valid historical past and recommend a few ideas for fending off its misuse to boot.
In this significant new interpretation of the troublesome, Jameson concludes that either recommendations are tainted, yet still yield clues as to the character of the phenomena they alleged to theorize. His really apt and vigilant probing of either terms—which can most likely no longer be banished at this past due date—helps us make clear our current political and inventive events.
Famed for his 1996 hoax that parodied the extraordinary postmodernist feedback of technology, Alan Sokal the following exposes many different examples of charlatanism, deflating the postmodernists of the left, the fundamentalists of definitely the right, and the muddle-headed of all political and apolitical stripes. Sokal does revisit his notorious hoax--the unique article is integrated within the ebook, with new explanatory footnotes--to light up matters which are with us much more pressingly this day.
In his booklet, "Post-Marxist idea, An Introduction", Philip Goldstein ambitiously inspires the criticisms of Marxist idea via a dialogue of the post-marxist revolution in conception. this is often complete via an exam of either Foucauldian and Althusserian perspectives of societal constructs comparable to oppression and racism and their impression on later concept.
This e-book offers the rules of a Hallidayan method of language reports, and introduces a suite of concepts for the grammatical research of English. It contains an summary of the functions of sensible grammar that demonstrates the sensible value of linguistic concept and research when it comes to concerns in schooling and society.
Additional info for A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction
It is closer to Martin Johnson’s more extreme Ovenden House, with its definitely ironic echoes of the Victorian polychromatic church, of flying buttresses, and of medieval gunslits in its thick masonry. Parodic echoing of the past, even with this kind of irony, can still be deferential. It is in this way that postmodern parody marks its paradoxical doubleness of both continuity and change, both authority and transgression. Postmodernist parody, be it in architecture, literature, painting, film, or music, uses its historical memory, its aesthetic introversion, to signal that this kind of self-reflexive discourse is always inextricably bound to social discourse.
Whatever the cause, a poetics of postmodernism should try to come to grips with some of the obvious paradoxes in both theory and practice. Let me offer just a few more examples: one would be the contradiction or irony of Lyotard’s (1984a) obviously meta-narrative theory of postmodernism’s incredulity to meta-narrative (see Lacoue-Labarthe 1984) or of Foucault’s early anti-totalizing epistemic totalizations. These are typically paradoxical: they are the masterful denials of mastery, the cohesive attacks on cohesion, the essentializing challenges to essences, that characterize postmodern theory.
The odd combination of the empirical and the rational in modernist theory was meant to suggest a scientific determinism that was to combat the cumulative power and weight of all that had been inherited from the past. Faith in the rational, scientific mastery of reality implicitly—then explicitly—denied the inherited, evolved cultural continuity of history. It is perhaps a loss of faith in these modernist values that has led to postmodernist architecture today. The practitioners of this new mode form an eclectic grouping, sharing only a sense of the past (though not a “random” one) and a desire to return to the idea of architecture as both communication and community (despite the fact that both of these concepts, from a postmodern Modelling the Postmodern 29 perspective, now have a distinctly problematic and decentralized ring to them).